Sven Red Writes

Politics And Economics

Category: Politics

Freedom of Speech

First Amendment

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution is a part of the Bill of Rights, which was ratified in 1791. The First Amendment protects several fundamental rights, including:

  • freedom of speech,
  • freedom of religion,
  • freedom of the press,
  • freedom of assembly, and the
  • right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


The text of the First Amendment reads:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


The First Amendment is a cornerstone of American democracy, as it protects the rights of individuals to express their opinions, beliefs, and ideas freely without fear of government censorship or retaliation. It also protects the freedom of the press, which is essential to a free and open society, and the right to assemble and petition the government, which allows citizens to voice their concerns and hold their elected officials accountable.

However, the First Amendment is not an absolute right, and there may be certain situations where speech or expression can be restricted, such as in cases of incitement to violence or hate speech. The interpretation and application of the First Amendment have been the subject of ongoing debate and legal challenges throughout American history.

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express their thoughts, opinions, and beliefs without fear of retaliation, censorship, or punishment by the government or other entities. However, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, and there are limitations on what one can say, such as hate speech or incitement to violence.

If you feel that you are not able to exercise your right to free speech, it’s important to understand the laws and regulations surrounding it in your country or region. In some countries, there may be restrictions or limitations on free speech that you need to be aware of. Additionally, if you believe your free speech rights are being violated, you may want to seek legal advice or contact a human rights organization for assistance.


Censorship is not the same as freedom of speech. Censorship is the act of suppressing or restricting information, ideas, or artistic expression that is considered objectionable or offensive by those in positions of authority. Censorship can be carried out by governments, organizations, or individuals.

Freedom of speech, on the other hand, is the right to express one’s opinions, beliefs, or ideas without fear of censorship, retaliation, or punishment. It is a fundamental human right that is enshrined in international law and recognized in many countries around the world.

While freedom of speech is an essential component of a democratic society, it is also important to recognize that it has limits. Speech that incites violence, promotes hate, or causes harm to others is not protected under the right to free speech. In such cases, censorship may be necessary to prevent harm to individuals or society as a whole.

Where Free Speech Could Cause Harm

Determining what speech causes harm to others can be a complex and contentious issue, and the standards used to evaluate harm can vary depending on cultural, legal, and social contexts.

In many countries, legal frameworks provide guidance on what types of speech are not protected by freedom of speech, such as speech that incites violence or promotes hate against a particular group. In other cases, social norms and cultural values may influence what is considered acceptable speech within a community.

It’s also worth noting that the interpretation of what constitutes harm can be subjective, and different people may have different views on what speech is harmful. In cases where there is a disagreement, it may be necessary to engage in dialogue and debate to reach a consensus on what speech is acceptable in a particular context.

Ultimately, it is the responsibility of governments, organizations, and individuals to ensure that they are acting within legal and ethical boundaries when it comes to speech. It’s important to respect the rights of individuals to express themselves freely while also recognizing the need to prevent harm to others.

Galileo Galilei

Galileo was born in Pisa on February 15, 1564. He died on January 8, 1642

Galileo Galilei was censored by the Catholic Church in the 17th century. Galileo was a scientist who made important discoveries in astronomy, including the observation of the moons of Jupiter and the phases of Venus. However, his findings contradicted the prevailing Aristotelian view that the Earth was at the center of the universe and led to a conflict with the Catholic Church, which held that the Earth was the center of the universe and that Galileo’s ideas contradicted the Bible.

In 1616, Galileo was ordered by the Church not to hold, teach, or defend the heliocentric theory, which placed the Sun at the center of the solar system. In 1632, Galileo published his book “Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems,” which presented arguments in favor of the heliocentric theory. The book was seen as a direct challenge to the Church’s authority, and Galileo was summoned to appear before the Inquisition. He was eventually forced to renounce his views and placed under house arrest for the remainder of his life.

Galileo’s case is often cited as an example of censorship and the suppression of scientific knowledge by religious or political authorities. However, it’s worth noting that the situation was complex, and there were many factors at play, including theological, scientific, and political considerations. Galileo’s case remains a significant example of the tension between scientific discovery and religious or political authority, and the importance of protecting freedom of thought and expression.

One of his most famous works, “Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New Sciences,” was published in 1638. This book contains many of his ideas on motion and mechanics and is considered one of the foundational texts of the modern scientific method.

Some of Galileo’s work was published posthumously. After Galileo’s death in 1642, his disciple, Vincenzo Viviani, published a collection of his letters and papers in a work called “Galileiana.” This collection includes many of Galileo’s observations and discoveries in astronomy, as well as his thoughts on philosophy and mathematics.

Modern Science

Despite the controversy surrounding his work during his lifetime, Galileo’s ideas had a profound impact on the development of modern science and the understanding of the universe. His contributions to the field of astronomy and his advocacy of empirical observation and experimentation helped to lay the foundation for modern physics and the scientific method. We can only guess what discoveries could have been made if Galileo had been free to talk with other scientists about his views. It is certainly possible that Galileo’s scientific discoveries could have been even more significant if he had not faced censorship and had been free to openly discuss his views with other scientists. The restrictions placed upon him by the Church may have hindered his ability to fully explore and develop his ideas and to collaborate with other scientists.

However, it’s also important to remember that Galileo’s work was still incredibly influential despite the obstacles he faced. His discoveries and theories about the universe paved the way for modern astronomy and physics, and his insistence on empirical observation and experimentation helped to establish the scientific method as a foundation for scientific inquiry.

Furthermore, the controversy and attention surrounding his work may have actually helped to promote scientific discourse and inquiry, as it sparked debate and discussion about the nature of the universe and the relationship between science and religion. In this sense, the censorship that Galileo faced may have ultimately contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge and the development of new ideas.

Overall, while it’s impossible to know exactly how Galileo’s work may have been affected by censorship, his contributions to science remain significant and influential to this day.

Denial of Freedom of Speech

Censorship is often considered a denial of freedom of speech, as it involves the restriction or suppression of certain ideas or expressions. When censorship is imposed, individuals or groups are prevented from expressing themselves freely, and their ability to participate in public discourse and share their ideas is limited.

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that is enshrined in many international declarations and constitutions. It is considered essential to the functioning of democratic societies and the protection of individual rights and liberties. When censorship is used to restrict speech, it can undermine the ability of individuals to participate fully in public life and to express themselves freely. It can also lead to cover ups of important information that should be known publicly.

However, it’s worth noting that there may be situations where censorship is necessary to prevent harm or protect certain groups. For example, speech that incites violence or promotes hate against a particular group may be considered harmful and may be restricted in order to protect the safety and well-being of individuals. In such cases, it’s important to balance the protection of individual rights with the need to prevent harm to others.

Modern Censorship

For more modern examples of censorship click here.

Permanent War For Permanent Peace

The global alliance for evil is the system that’s behind the current reality, which some call “permanent war for permanent peace,” and others call “perpetual war for perpetual peace,” but it’s the same thing no matter what it’s called: the ‘national security’ system that exists today, and that was accurately foreseen (and dramatically embellished) in George Orwell’s allegorical novel, 1984. What it is, in reality, is the coerced taking from the public so as to further enrich the aristocracy. And here’s how this system functions, in reality: the aristocracy are the billionaires who control their country’s government and own controlling blocs of stock not only in the privately owned news-media but in the privately owned firms (such as Lockheed Martin and BAE) that make weapons which are sold only to their own government and to the governments which are allied with it. Those governments collectively are called ‘allies’, and thus constitute an international team of aristocracies whose weapons are made by their team and are used against any governments which this team of aristocracies chooses to label as the team’s ‘enemies’. These ‘enemies’ are any nations that are targeted to be conquered by this aristocratic team.

This article is a snippet taken from Mint Press News. You can read the entire article here.

Just Who Is Economically Incompetent

So, given the figures in the graphic (public domain and uncontroversial), exactly why do people imagine the Tories are more economically competent than Labour?
It wouldn’t be because they’re constantly told this by the MSM (mainstream media)?
Goebbels himself stated that if you repeat a lie often enough, people will come to believe it…

My Blog © 2019 Frontier Theme